You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Avoiding bio‐perversity from carbon sequestration solutions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2011.00213.x |
| Authors |
David B. Lindenmayer, Kristin B. Hulvey, Richard J. Hobbs, Mark Colyvan, Adam Felton, Hugh Possingham, Will Steffen, Kerrie Wilson, Kara Youngentob, Philip Gibbons |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 22% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 22% |
| Sweden | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 200 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 64 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 92 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 37 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#680,359
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#246
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,634
of 251,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.