↓ Skip to main content

Point-of-View: Arguments for conventional fisheries management and against no-take marine protected areas: only half of the story?

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
Title
Point-of-View: Arguments for conventional fisheries management and against no-take marine protected areas: only half of the story?
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11160-006-9016-8
Authors

P. J. S. Jones

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 3 1%
Spain 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
Canada 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Latvia 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 271 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 69 23%
Student > Master 57 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 7%
Other 18 6%
Other 64 22%
Unknown 22 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 125 42%
Environmental Science 95 32%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 1%
Other 13 4%
Unknown 34 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2023.
All research outputs
#6,272,753
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#305
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,540
of 71,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.