↓ Skip to main content

Retraction Note: Solder Selection for Reflowing Large Ceramic Substrates During PCB Assembly

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 100)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
Title
Retraction Note: Solder Selection for Reflowing Large Ceramic Substrates During PCB Assembly
Published in
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11668-018-0532-3
Authors

Prashant Reddy Gangidi, Noy Souriyasak

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
#3,505,282
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention
#3
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,534
of 338,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them