↓ Skip to main content

The influence of group membership on cross-contextual imitation

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
The influence of group membership on cross-contextual imitation
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, December 2015
DOI 10.3758/s13423-015-0983-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver Genschow, Simon Schindler

Abstract

Research on mimicry has demonstrated that individuals imitate in-group members more strongly than out-group members. In the present study, we tested whether such top-down modulation also applies for more extreme forms of direct mapping, such as for cross-contextual imitation settings, in which individuals imitate others' movements without sharing a common goal or context. Models on self-other control suggest that top-down modulations are based merely on a direct link between social sensory processing and imitation. That is, perceived similarities between oneself and another person is sufficient to amplify a shared representation between own and others' actions, which then trigger imitation. However, motivational accounts explain such findings with the assumption that individuals are motivated to affiliate with others. Because imitation is linked to positive social consequences, individuals should imitate in-group members more strongly than out-group members. We tested these two theoretical accounts against each other by applying a cross-contextual imitation paradigm. The results demonstrate that in-group members are more strongly cross-contextually imitated than out-group members the higher individuals' motivation to affiliate with the in-group is. This supports motivational models but not self-other control accounts. Further theoretical implications are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 52%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Linguistics 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 26%