You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prebiotic effects: metabolic and health benefits
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of Nutrition, August 2010
|
DOI | 10.1017/s0007114510003363 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marcel Roberfroid, Glenn R. Gibson, Lesley Hoyles, Anne L. McCartney, Robert Rastall, Ian Rowland, Danielle Wolvers, Bernhard Watzl, Hania Szajewska, Bernd Stahl, Francisco Guarner, Frederique Respondek, Kevin Whelan, Veronique Coxam, Marie-Jeanne Davicco, Laurent Léotoing, Yohann Wittrant, Nathalie M. Delzenne, Patrice D. Cani, Audrey M. Neyrinck, Agnes Meheust |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 30% |
United States | 2 | 20% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,732 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
Spain | 3 | <1% |
Brazil | 3 | <1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
India | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 11 | <1% |
Unknown | 1690 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 292 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 244 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 216 | 12% |
Researcher | 199 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 94 | 5% |
Other | 283 | 16% |
Unknown | 404 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 374 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 261 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 174 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 105 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 61 | 4% |
Other | 268 | 15% |
Unknown | 489 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#488,619
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Nutrition
#277
of 6,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,201
of 103,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Nutrition
#4
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.