| Title |
Ground Roast Coffee: Review of Analytical Strategies to Estimate Geographic Origin, Species Authenticity and Adulteration by Dilution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Food Analytical Methods, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12161-016-0756-3 |
| Authors |
D. Thorburn Burns, L. Tweed, M. J. Walker |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 17% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 22% |
| Chemistry | 14 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,576,061
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Food Analytical Methods
#61
of 582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,539
of 422,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Analytical Methods
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 582 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.