↓ Skip to main content

Ventilation monitoring during moderate sedation in GI patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Ventilation monitoring during moderate sedation in GI patients
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10877-015-9809-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas J. Ebert, Austin H. Middleton, Nikhil Makhija

Abstract

Sedation in locations outside the operating room (OR) is common. Guidelines for safe patient monitoring have been updated by the American Society of Anesthesiology to include monitoring of ventilation and/or carbon dioxide (CO2). Although technologies exist to monitor these variables, the quality and/or availability of these measurements in non-OR settings is not optimal. This quality improvement project assessed the value of impedance technology for monitoring minute ventilation (MV) compared to standard end-tidal monitoring of CO2 (ETCO2). Patients undergoing GI exams with moderate sedation provided by anesthesia providers were monitored for MV with a respiratory volume monitor (ExSpiron 1Xi, Respiratory Motion, Waltham, MA) and ETCO2 via nasal cannula (NC). Calibration and baseline data were collected prior to sedation. Continuous MV and ETCO2 data were collected and averaged, providing minute values after sedation medications throughout the procedure. Stable periods of reduced MV were averaged and used in comparison to ETCO2. Data from 20 patients were evaluated. After sedation, the expected decrease in MV after sedation was observed in 18 of 20 patients (average -47.82 %), while an increase in ETCO2 was observed in just 10 of 20 patients (average -5.17 mm Hg). The correlation coefficient between changes in MV and ETCO2 in response to sedation administration was positive and not significant, r = 0.223. Ventilation monitoring may provide an element of safety for earlier and more reliable detection of reduced ventilation compared to a surrogate for hypoventilation, ETCO2, in patients undergoing sedation for GI procedures outside of the OR.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 19%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 12 25%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Engineering 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 12 25%