You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
WNT Signaling in Cancer Immunosurveillance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Cell Biology, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.08.005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lorenzo Galluzzi, Stefani Spranger, Elaine Fuchs, Alejandro López-Soto |
| Abstract |
Deregulated WNT signaling has been shown to favor malignant transformation, tumor progression, and resistance to conventional cancer therapy in a variety of preclinical and clinical settings. Accumulating evidence suggests that aberrant WNT signaling may also subvert cancer immunosurveillance, hence promoting immunoevasion and resistance to multiple immunotherapeutics, including immune checkpoint blockers. Here, we discuss the molecular and cellular mechanisms through which WNT signaling influences cancer immunosurveillance and present potential therapeutic avenues to harness currently available WNT modulators for cancer immunotherapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Singapore | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Iraq | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 74% |
| Scientists | 4 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 196 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 13% |
| Researcher | 24 | 12% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 48 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 62 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 55 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,713,898
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Cell Biology
#478
of 1,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,533
of 348,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Cell Biology
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.