↓ Skip to main content

The effects of different doses of caffeine on endurance cycling time trial performance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Sports Sciences, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
61 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
448 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of different doses of caffeine on endurance cycling time trial performance
Published in
Journal of Sports Sciences, December 2011
DOI 10.1080/02640414.2011.632431
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ben Desbrow, Caren Biddulph, Brooke Devlin, Gary D. Grant, Shailendra Anoopkumar-Dukie, Michael D. Leveritt

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of two different doses of caffeine on endurance cycle time trial performance in male athletes. Using a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study design, sixteen well-trained and familiarised male cyclists (Mean ± s: Age = 32.6 ± 8.3 years; Body mass = 78.5 ± 6.0 kg; Height = 180.9 ± 5.5 cm VO2(peak) = 60.4 ± 4.1 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)) completed three experimental trials, following training and dietary standardisation. Participants ingested either a placebo, or 3 or 6 mg x kg(-1) body mass of caffeine 90 min prior to completing a set amount of work equivalent to 75% of peak sustainable power output for 60 min. Exercise performance was significantly (P < 0.05) improved with both caffeine treatments as compared to placebo (4.2% with 3 mg x kg(-1) body mass and 2.9% with 6 mg x kg(-1) body mass). The difference between the two caffeine doses was not statistically significant (P = 0.24). Caffeine ingestion at either dose resulted in significantly higher heart rate values than the placebo conditions (P < 0.05), but no statistically significant treatment effects in ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were observed (P = 0.39). A caffeine dose of 3 mg x kg(-1) body mass appears to improve cycling performance in well-trained and familiarised athletes. Doubling the dose to 6 mg x kg(-1) body mass does not confer any additional improvements in performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 437 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 136 30%
Student > Master 88 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 8%
Student > Postgraduate 24 5%
Researcher 18 4%
Other 48 11%
Unknown 97 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 165 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 2%
Other 57 13%
Unknown 116 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#481,763
of 25,649,244 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Sports Sciences
#102
of 4,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,423
of 248,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Sports Sciences
#3
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,649,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.