You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Qualitative Study of Prescription Contraception Use: The Perspectives of Users, General Practitioners and Pharmacists
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0144074 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leigh-Ann Sweeney, Gerard J. Molloy, Molly Byrne, Andrew W. Murphy, Karen Morgan, Carmel M. Hughes, Roger Ingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Ireland | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 119 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 24% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,538,491
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#104,947
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,330
of 401,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,645
of 4,928 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,928 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.