↓ Skip to main content

経肛門的にウオッカを注入し発症した化学性(アルコール性)直腸結腸炎の1例

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine), May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1122 X users
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
経肛門的にウオッカを注入し発症した化学性(アルコール性)直腸結腸炎の1例
Published in
Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine), May 2013
DOI 10.11231/jaem.33.735
Authors

武田 宗和, 名取 恵子, 諸井 隆一, 原田 知幸, 矢口 有乃, 稲垣 伸洋

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,122 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 926. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#18,716
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine)
#1
of 70 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72
of 205,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them