↓ Skip to main content

Garden varieties: How attractive are recommended garden plants to butterflies?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Insect Conservation, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Garden varieties: How attractive are recommended garden plants to butterflies?
Published in
Journal of Insect Conservation, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10841-015-9827-9
Authors

Kyle Shackleton, Francis L. W. Ratnieks

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 3%
Hungary 1 2%
Unknown 57 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Researcher 5 8%
Professor 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 38%
Environmental Science 15 25%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 18 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2015.
All research outputs
#3,195,338
of 24,315,442 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Conservation
#111
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,753
of 396,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Conservation
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,315,442 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.