↓ Skip to main content

Nonlinear behavior of some hydrostatically stressed isotropic elastomeric foams

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Mechanica, September 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 130)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Nonlinear behavior of some hydrostatically stressed isotropic elastomeric foams
Published in
Acta Mechanica, September 1999
DOI 10.1007/bf01291841
Authors

J. K. Dienes, J. C. Solem

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 60%
Chemistry 1 20%
Materials Science 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,717,448
of 23,467,261 outputs
Outputs from Acta Mechanica
#15
of 130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,247
of 35,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Mechanica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,467,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them