You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of exercise intensity on 24-h energy expenditure and nutrient oxidation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Physiology, March 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1152/japplphysiol.00706.2001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward L. Melanson, Teresa A. Sharp, Helen M. Seagle, Tracy J. Horton, William T. Donahoo, Gary K. Grunwald, Jere T. Hamilton, James O. Hill |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to determine the effects of exercise at different intensities on 24-h energy expenditure (EE) and substrate oxidation. Sixteen adults (8 men and 8 women) were studied on three occasions [sedentary day (Con), a low-intensity exercise day (LI; 400 kcal at 40% of maximal oxygen consumption) and a high-intensity exercise day (HI; 400 kcal at 70% of maximal oxygen consumption)] by using whole room indirect calorimetry. Both 24-h EE and carbohydrate oxidation were significantly elevated on the exercise days (Con < LI = HI), but 24-h fat oxidation was not different across conditions. Muscle enzymatic profile was not consistently related to 24-h fat or carbohydrate oxidation. With further analysis, it was found that, compared with men, women sustained slightly higher rates of 24-h fat oxidation (mg x kg FFM(-1) x min(-1)) and had a muscle enzymatic profile favoring fat oxidation. It is concluded that exercise intensity has no effect on 24-h EE or nutrient oxidation. Additionally, it appears that women may sustain slightly greater 24-h fat oxidation rates during waking and active periods of the day. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 29% |
| Spain | 3 | 21% |
| Greece | 1 | 7% |
| South Africa | 1 | 7% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 36% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 164 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 48 | 28% |
| Unknown | 26 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 69 | 40% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 31 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,760,993
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,898
of 8,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,178
of 46,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Physiology
#14
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.