↓ Skip to main content

Using topographical attributes to evaluate gully erosion proneness (susceptibility) in two mediterranean basins: advantages and limitations

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Using topographical attributes to evaluate gully erosion proneness (susceptibility) in two mediterranean basins: advantages and limitations
Published in
Natural Hazards, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1703-0
Authors

Álvaro Gómez-Gutiérrez, Christian Conoscenti, Silvia Eleonora Angileri, Edoardo Rotigliano, Susanne Schnabel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 27%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Master 9 11%
Lecturer 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 28%
Environmental Science 14 16%
Engineering 10 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 26 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2015.
All research outputs
#13,757,736
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#1,189
of 1,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,507
of 264,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#16
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.