| Title |
Identification and characterisation of the high-risk surgical population in the United Kingdom
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc4928 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rupert M Pearse, David A Harrison, Philip James, David Watson, Charles Hinds, Andrew Rhodes, R Michael Grounds, E David Bennett |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 444 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Gabon | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 435 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 62 | 14% |
| Other | 56 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 50 | 11% |
| Researcher | 42 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 9% |
| Other | 104 | 23% |
| Unknown | 92 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 279 | 63% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 2% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 29 | 7% |
| Unknown | 107 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,410,691
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,472
of 6,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,575
of 91,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.