Title |
Best practices in mixed methods for quality of life research
|
---|---|
Published in |
Quality of Life Research, February 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11136-012-0122-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ann C. Klassen, John Creswell, Vicki L. Plano Clark, Katherine Clegg Smith, Helen I. Meissner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 697 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Mexico | 2 | <1% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 688 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 135 | 19% |
Student > Master | 91 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 47 | 7% |
Lecturer | 41 | 6% |
Researcher | 36 | 5% |
Other | 88 | 13% |
Unknown | 259 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 86 | 12% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 69 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 6% |
Psychology | 32 | 5% |
Other | 149 | 21% |
Unknown | 271 | 39% |