↓ Skip to main content

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pulmonary Hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pulmonary Hypertension
Published in
Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12410-015-9360-y
Authors

Andrew J. Swift, Laura C. Saunders, Tom Sproson, Nehal Hussain, Guilhem J. Collier, Helen Marshall, David G. Kiely, Jim M. Wild

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Unknown 12 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 11 69%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2015.
All research outputs
#18,431,664
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports
#78
of 107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,686
of 284,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.