↓ Skip to main content

A comparative study of uncertainty propagation methods for black-box-type problems

Overview of attention for article published in Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A comparative study of uncertainty propagation methods for black-box-type problems
Published in
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00158-008-0234-7
Authors

S. H. Lee, W. Chen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 220 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 40%
Researcher 31 14%
Student > Master 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Lecturer 9 4%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 32 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 115 51%
Computer Science 17 8%
Chemical Engineering 8 4%
Mathematics 8 4%
Physics and Astronomy 7 3%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 42 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
#75
of 346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,450
of 80,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 346 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them