↓ Skip to main content

Brief Report: Effect of a Focused Imitation Intervention on Social Functioning in Children with Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
Title
Brief Report: Effect of a Focused Imitation Intervention on Social Functioning in Children with Autism
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10803-011-1423-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brooke Ingersoll

Abstract

Imitation is an early skill thought to play a role in social development, leading some to suggest that teaching imitation to children with autism should lead to improvements in social functioning. This study used a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a focused imitation intervention on initiation of joint attention and social-emotional functioning in 27 young children with autism. Results indicated the treatment group made significantly more gains in joint attention initiations at post-treatment and follow-up and social-emotional functioning at follow-up than the control group. Although gains in social functioning were associated with treatment, a mediation analysis did not support imitation as the mechanism of action. These findings suggest the intervention improves social functioning in children with ASD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 232 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 16%
Student > Master 37 15%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 55 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 77 32%
Social Sciences 31 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 69 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,176,269
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,699
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,318
of 246,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#15
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.