↓ Skip to main content

The concept of strongly interacting groups in self-assembly of soft matter

Overview of attention for article published in The European Physical Journal E, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
The concept of strongly interacting groups in self-assembly of soft matter
Published in
The European Physical Journal E, September 2018
DOI 10.1140/epje/i2018-11699-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

I. A. Nyrkova, A. N. Semenov

Abstract

Amphiphilic molecules in solution typically produce structures coming from cooperative interactions of many synergetically acting functional units. If all essential interactions are weak, the structure can be treated theoretically based on a free energy expansion for small interaction parameters. However, most self-assembling soft matter systems involve strong specific interactions of functional units leading to qualitatively new structures of highly soluble micellar or fibrillar aggregates. Here we focus on the systems with the so-called strongly interacting groups (SIGs) incorporated into unimer molecules and discuss the effects of packing frustrations and unimer chirality as well as the origins of spontaneous morphological chirality in the case of achiral unimers. We describe several theoretical approaches (overcoming the limitations of weak interaction models) including the concepts of super-strong segregation, geometrical mismatch and orientational frustration. We also review some recently developed phenomenological theories of surfactant membranes and multiscale hierarchical approaches based on all-atomic modeling of packing structures of amphiphilic molecules with SIGs. In particular, we discuss self-assembling structures in systems possessing simultaneously several distinct types of SIGs: solutions of beta-sheet oligopeptides (showing different fibrillar morphologies), aromatic diamide-ester molecules (forming membranes, helical ribbons and tubules), and triarylamine amide derivatives (producing light-controlled supramolecular nanowires).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 57%
Unspecified 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 14%
Computer Science 1 14%
Physics and Astronomy 1 14%
Chemistry 1 14%
Materials Science 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,879,072
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal E
#560
of 650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,376
of 338,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal E
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.