↓ Skip to main content

Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever: epidemiological trends and controversies in treatment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever: epidemiological trends and controversies in treatment
Published in
BMC Medicine, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-9-131
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helena C Maltezou, Anna Papa

Abstract

Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) virus has the widest geographic range of all tick-borne viruses and is endemic in more than 30 countries in Eurasia and Africa. Over the past decade, new foci have emerged or re-emerged in the Balkans and neighboring areas. Here we discuss the factors influencing CCHF incidence and focus on the main issue of the use of ribavirin for treating this infection. Given the dynamics of CCHF emergence in the past decade, development of new anti-viral drugs and a vaccine is urgently needed to treat and prevent this acute, life-threatening disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Sri Lanka 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 83 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 7%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 22 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2016.
All research outputs
#276,782
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#233
of 3,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,421
of 240,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.