↓ Skip to main content

Amikacin Liposome Inhalation Suspension for Treatment-Refractory Lung Disease Caused by Mycobacterium avium Complex (CONVERT). A Prospective, Open-Label, Randomized Study

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
228 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Amikacin Liposome Inhalation Suspension for Treatment-Refractory Lung Disease Caused by Mycobacterium avium Complex (CONVERT). A Prospective, Open-Label, Randomized Study
Published in
American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, September 2018
DOI 10.1164/rccm.201807-1318oc
Pubmed ID
Authors

David E Griffith, Gina Eagle, Rachel Thomson, Timothy R Aksamit, Naoki Hasegawa, Kozo Morimoto, Doreen J Addrizzo-Harris, Anne E O'Donnell, Theodore K Marras, Patrick A Flume, Michael R Loebinger, Lucy Morgan, Luigi R Codecasa, Adam T Hill, Stephen J Ruoss, Jae-Joon Yim, Felix C Ringshausen, Stephen K Field, Julie V Philley, Richard J Wallace, Jakko van Ingen, Chris Coulter, James Nezamis, Kevin L Winthrop

Abstract

Rationale Improved therapeutic options are needed for patients with treatment-refractory nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease caused by Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of daily amikacin liposome inhalation suspension (ALIS) added to standard guideline-based therapy (GBT) in patients with refractory MAC lung disease. Methods Adults with amikacin-susceptible MAC lung disease and MAC-positive sputum cultures despite ≥6 months of stable GBT were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive ALIS with GBT (ALIS+GBT) or GBT alone. Once-daily ALIS was supplied in single-use vials delivering 590 mg amikacin to the nebulizer. The primary endpoint was culture conversion, defined as 3 consecutive monthly MAC-negative sputum cultures by month 6. Measurements and Main Results Enrolled patients (ALIS+GBT, n=224; GBT-alone, n=112) were a mean 64.7 years old and 69.3% female. Most had underlying bronchiectasis (62.5%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (14.3%), or both (11.9%). Culture conversion was achieved by 65 of 224 patients (29.0%) with ALIS+GBT and 10 of 112 (8.9%) with GBT alone (OR, 4.22; 95% CI [2.08, 8.57]; P<0.001). Patients in the ALIS+GBT arm vs GBT alone were more likely to achieve conversion (hazard ratio, 3.90; 95% CI, [2.00, 7.60]). Respiratory adverse events (primarily dysphonia, cough, and dyspnea) were reported in 87.4% of patients receiving ALIS+GBT and 50.0% receiving GBT alone; serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 20.2% and 17.9% of patients, respectively. Conclusions Addition of ALIS to GBT for treatment-refractory MAC lung disease achieved significantly greater culture conversion by month 6 than GBT alone, with comparable rates of serious adverse events. Clinical trial registration available at www.clinicaltrials.gov, ID NCT02344004.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 213 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Student > Master 19 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 13 6%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 76 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 80 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,663,289
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#1,374
of 12,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,551
of 348,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#18
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.