↓ Skip to main content

Global Networks of Symbiodinium-Bacteria Within the Coral Holobiont

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Global Networks of Symbiodinium-Bacteria Within the Coral Holobiont
Published in
Microbial Ecology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00248-018-1255-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachele Bernasconi, Michael Stat, Annette Koenders, Megan J. Huggett

Abstract

Scleractinian corals form the framework of coral reefs and host abundant and diverse microbial communities that are fundamental to their success. A very limited number of studies have examined the co-occurrence of multiple partners within the coral 'holobiont' and their pattern of specificity over different geographical scales. In this study, we explored two molecular sequence datasets representing associations between corals and dinoflagellates in the genus Symbiodinium and between corals and bacteria, across the globe. Through a network theory approach, we characterised patterns of co-occurrences between bacteria and Symbiodinium with 13 coral genera across six water basins. The majority of the bacteria-Symbiodinium co-occurrences were specific to either a coral genus or water basin, emphasising both coral host and environment as important factors driving the diversity of coral assemblages. Yet, results also identified bacteria and Symbiodinium that were shared by multiple coral genera across several water basins. The analyses indicate that shared co-occurrences are independent of the phylogenetic and biogeographic relationship of coral hosts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 22%
Researcher 22 21%
Student > Bachelor 19 18%
Student > Master 11 10%
Other 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 27%
Environmental Science 22 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 20%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 21 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2018.
All research outputs
#2,519,644
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#127
of 2,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,756
of 342,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#2
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.