You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hans Bergerの夢 — How did EEG become the EEG? — その2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.11422/jscn.44.60 |
| Authors |
宮内 哲 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 13 | 39% |
| Unknown | 20 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 88% |
| Scientists | 4 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,911,160
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
#5
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,047
of 315,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one scored the same or higher as 33 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them