| Title |
Translating research to policy at the NCSE 2017 symposium “Microbiology of the Built Environment: Implications for Health and Design”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-018-0552-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashleigh Bope, Mark H. Weir, Amy Pruden, Michael Morowitz, Jade Mitchell, Karen C. Dannemiller |
| Abstract |
Here, we summarize a symposium entitled "Microbiology of the Built Environment: Implications for Health and Design" that was presented at the National Council for Science and the Environment (NCSE) 17th National Conference and Global Forum in January 2017. We covered topics including indoor microbial exposures and childhood asthma, the influence of hospital design on neonatal development, the role of the microbiome in our premise (i.e., building) plumbing systems, antibiotic resistance, and quantitative microbial risk assessment. This symposium engaged the broader scientific and policy communities in a discussion to increase awareness of this critical research area and translate findings to practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 18% |
| Researcher | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 9 | 16% |
| Engineering | 6 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2019.
All research outputs
#13,109,215
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,338
of 1,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,216
of 337,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#62
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.