| Title |
Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Information Systems, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1057/ejis.2011.51 |
| Authors |
Joost F Wolfswinkel, Elfi Furtmueller, Celeste P M Wilderom |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Austria | 1 | 14% |
| Brazil | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,934 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 11 | <1% |
| Germany | 11 | <1% |
| United States | 10 | <1% |
| South Africa | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1862 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 392 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 388 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 154 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 144 | 7% |
| Researcher | 106 | 5% |
| Other | 257 | 13% |
| Unknown | 493 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 523 | 27% |
| Computer Science | 353 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 145 | 7% |
| Engineering | 70 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 49 | 3% |
| Other | 237 | 12% |
| Unknown | 557 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,028,283
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Information Systems
#19
of 319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,357
of 438,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Information Systems
#5
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.