You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of supplemental feeding and aggregation on fecal glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations in elk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Management, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jwmg.312 |
| Authors |
Victoria E. Forristal, Scott Creel, Mark L. Taper, Brandon M. Scurlock, Paul C. Cross |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 23% |
| Researcher | 15 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 11% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2018.
All research outputs
#3,465,505
of 24,586,986 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#401
of 2,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,920
of 249,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,586,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.