↓ Skip to main content

Proposed nomenclature for Pseudallescheria, Scedosporium and related genera

Overview of attention for article published in Fungal Diversity, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Proposed nomenclature for Pseudallescheria, Scedosporium and related genera
Published in
Fungal Diversity, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13225-014-0295-4
Authors

Michaela Lackner, G. Sybren de Hoog, Liyue Yang, Leandro Ferreira Moreno, Sarah A. Ahmed, Fritz Andreas, Josef Kaltseis, Markus Nagl, Cornelia Lass-Flörl, Brigitte Risslegger, Günter Rambach, Cornelia Speth, Vincent Robert, Walter Buzina, Sharon Chen, Jean-Philippe Bouchara, José F. Cano-Lira, Josep Guarro, Josepa Gené, Fabiola Fernández Silva, Rosa Haido, Gerhard Haase, Vladimir Havlicek, Dea Garcia-Hermoso, Jacques F. Meis, Ferry Hagen, Martin Kirchmair, Johannes Rainer, Katharina Schwabenbauer, Mirjam Zoderer, Wieland Meyer, Felix Gilgado, Katharina Schwabenbauer, Vania A. Vicente, Elena Piecková, Monika Regenermel, Peter-Michael Rath, Joerg Steinmann, Xisto Wellington de Alencar, Françoise Symoens, Kathrin Tintelnot, Krzysztof Ulfig, Aristea Velegraki, Anna Maria Tortorano, Sandrine Giraud, Sara Mina, Kinga Rigler-Hohenwarter, Fernando L. Hernando, Andoni Ramirez-Garcia, Aize Pellon, Jashanpreet Kaur, Eliana Barreto Bergter, Jardel Vieira de Meirelles, Ingrid Dutra da Silva, Laurence Delhaes, Ana Alastruey-Izquerdo, Ruo-yu Li, Qiaoyun Lu, Tarek Moussa, Omar Almaghrabi, Hassan Al-Zahrani, Gen Okada, Shuwen Deng, Wangqing Liao, Jingsi Zeng, Jouni Issakainen, Livia Cristina Liporagi Lopes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 72 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Master 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 20 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 22 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,427,128
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Fungal Diversity
#79
of 271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,920
of 228,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fungal Diversity
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them