↓ Skip to main content

Autopsy findings in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the modern era: a focus on lung pathology and acute respiratory failure

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Hematology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Autopsy findings in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the modern era: a focus on lung pathology and acute respiratory failure
Published in
Annals of Hematology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00277-018-3494-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andry Van de Louw, Allyson M. Lewis, Zhaohai Yang

Abstract

We aimed to report autopsy findings in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in the modern era, and also to focus on lung pathology in the subgroup of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) of unknown etiology, which is associated with especially high mortality rates. Charts and autopsy reports of 107 patients (59 AML and 48 NHL) autopsied between 2003 and 2018 were reviewed. More than 50% of patients had missed major diagnoses found at autopsy with 95% of lungs displaying abnormal findings. Malignant infiltration in at least one organ was observed in about 70% of patients with either no complete remission or relapse at the time of death (n = 92) versus 20% in patients without signs of active malignancy (n = 15) (p = 0.001). In patients with ARF of unknown etiology (n = 59), the proportion of malignant lung infiltration was 27% and equilibrated with bacterial pneumonias (29%), fungal pneumonias represented 8%, and isolated alveolar damage or pulmonary edema were the only findings in 32% of patients. Overall, 85% of patients with ARF of unknown etiology had either relapsed or not achieved remission at time of death and 80% of patients with malignant lung infiltration had ARF of unknown etiology. Ninety percent of malignant infiltration and fungal infections were observed in patients with no complete remission or relapse. Autopsy remains valuable in AML and NHL patients; besides infections, malignant infiltration is a significant contributor to ARF of unknown etiology and is rarely diagnosed ante mortem.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 14%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2018.
All research outputs
#14,425,183
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Hematology
#1,029
of 2,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,267
of 337,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Hematology
#14
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.