↓ Skip to main content

Characteristics and Response to Crizotinib in ALK-Rearranged, Advanced Non-Adenocarcinoma, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NA-NSCLC) Patients: a Retrospective Study and Literature Review

Overview of attention for article published in Targeted Oncology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Characteristics and Response to Crizotinib in ALK-Rearranged, Advanced Non-Adenocarcinoma, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NA-NSCLC) Patients: a Retrospective Study and Literature Review
Published in
Targeted Oncology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11523-018-0592-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bo Zhang, Yanwei Zhang, Jianlin Xu, Xueyan Zhang, Tianqing Chu, Shuyuan Wang, Jie Qian, Rong Qiao, Jun Lu, Lele Zhang, Baohui Han

Abstract

Oncogenic fusion genes consisting of echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) can be detected in 5-7% of lung adenocarcinoma cases. The prevalence of ALK rearrangement in non-adenocarcinoma, non-small cell lung cancers (NA-NSCLC) is currently unknown. In addition, the efficacy of crizotinib in these patients has not been well established. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of ALK rearrangement in NA-NSCLC patients and the therapeutic efficacy of crizotinib in these patients. We included NA-NSCLC patients who were tested for the presence of ALK rearrangement in our institution from January 2013 to May 2018. The effectiveness of crizotinib in ALK-positive patients was retrospectively analyzed. A literature review was performed and eligible previously published cases were analyzed in combination with our data. A total of 4662 patients were screened and 1696 NA-NSCLC patients were tested for the presence of ALK rearrangement during the study period. Thirty-two positive patients were identified (1.9%, 95% CI, 1.2-2.5%). A statistically higher percentage of younger (58.0 vs. 63.0, p = 0.01), female patients (53.1% vs. 10.8%, p < 0.01) who were non-smokers (71.9% vs. 40.6%, p < 0.01) and whose tumors contained adenocarcinoma components (34.4% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.01) were observed in the ALK-positive group. Eighteen patients were excluded from the study and 14 eligible patients were included for survival analysis. The median duration of crizotinib treatment (MDT) as a proxy for progression-free survival of the 14 eligible patients in our institution was 6.0 months (95% CI, 1.2-10.8 months). We combined our data with sporadic cases from 16 previous publications (total n = 37) and found that the MDT was 7.0 months (95% CI, 6.0-8.0 months). Our study suggests the opportunity to test ALK rearrangement in NA-NSCLC patients, especially in younger, female, non-smoking patients containing adenocarcinoma components. Crizotinib provides an option for the treatment of NA-NSCLC patients who have an ALK rearrangement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Chemistry 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2018.
All research outputs
#17,990,045
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Targeted Oncology
#323
of 556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,916
of 337,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Targeted Oncology
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 556 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.