↓ Skip to main content

Sources of Ca2+ for contraction of the heart tube of Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology B, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Sources of Ca2+ for contraction of the heart tube of Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology B, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00360-018-1183-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arnaldo Fim Neto, Rosana A. Bassani, Pedro X. de Oliveira, José W. M. Bassani

Abstract

Insect and vertebrate hearts share the ability to generate spontaneously their rhythmic electrical activity, which triggers the fluid-propelling mechanical activity. Although insects have been used as models in studies on the impact of genetic alterations on cardiac function, there is surprisingly little information on the generation of the inotropic activity in their hearts. The main goal of this study was to investigate the sources of Ca2+ for contraction in Tenebrio molitor hearts perfused in situ, in which inotropic activity was assessed by the systolic variation of the cardiac luminal diameter. Increasing the pacing rate from 1.0 to 2.5 Hz depressed contraction amplitude and accelerated relaxation. To avoid inotropic interference of variations in spontaneous rate, which have been shown to occur in insect heart during maneuvers that affect Ca2+ cycling, experiments were performed under electrical pacing at near-physiological rates. Raising the extracellular Ca2+ concentration from 0.5 to 8 mM increased contraction amplitude in a manner sensitive to L-type Ca2+ channel blockade by D600. Inotropic depression was observed after treatment with caffeine or thapsigargin, which impair Ca2+ accumulation by the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). D600, but not inhibition of the sarcolemmal Na+/Ca2+ exchanger by KB-R7943, further depressed inotropic activity in thapsigargin-treated hearts. From these results, it is possible to conclude that in T. molitor heart, as in vertebrates: (a) inotropic and lusitropic activities are modulated by the heart rate; and (b) Ca2+ availability for contraction depends on both Ca2+ influx via L-type channels and Ca2+ release from the SR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Engineering 2 15%
Physics and Astronomy 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2018.
All research outputs
#19,854,405
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#648
of 840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,945
of 341,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.