You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predicting survival in heart failure: validation of the MAGGIC heart failure risk score in 51 043 patients from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Heart Failure, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ejhf.32 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ulrik Sartipy, Ulf Dahlström, Magnus Edner, Lars H. Lund |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 14% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 39 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 49% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 45 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#8,198,620
of 24,565,648 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Heart Failure
#1,361
of 2,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,879
of 319,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Heart Failure
#70
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,565,648 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.