↓ Skip to main content

Prospective assessment of the decision-making impact of the Breast Cancer Index in recommending extended adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with early-stage ER-positive breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Prospective assessment of the decision-making impact of the Breast Cancer Index in recommending extended adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with early-stage ER-positive breast cancer
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10549-015-3631-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tara Sanft, Bilge Aktas, Brock Schroeder, Veerle Bossuyt, Michael DiGiovanna, Maysa Abu-Khalaf, Gina Chung, Andrea Silber, Erin Hofstatter, Sarah Mougalian, Lianne Epstein, Christos Hatzis, Cathy Schnabel, Lajos Pusztai

Abstract

Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy (10 vs. 5 years) trials have demonstrated improved outcomes in early-stage estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer; however, the absolute benefit is modest, and toxicity and tolerability challenges remain. Predictive and prognostic information from genomic analysis may help inform this clinical decision. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI) on physician recommendations for extended endocrine therapy and on patient anxiety and decision conflict. Patients with stage I-III, ER-positive breast cancer who completed at least 3.5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy were offered participation. Genomic classification with BCI was performed on archived tumor tissues and the results were reported to the treating physician who discussed results with the patient. Patients and physicians completed pre- and post-test questionnaires regarding preferences for extended endocrine therapy. Patients also completed the validated traditional Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) and State Trait Anxiety Inventory forms (STAI-Y1) pre- and post-test. 96 patients were enrolled at the Yale Cancer Center [median age 60.5 years (range 45-87), 79 % postmenopausal, 60 % stage I). BCI predicted a low risk of late recurrence in 59 % of patients versus intermediate/high in 24 and 17 %, respectively. Physician recommendations for extended endocrine therapy changed for 26 % of patients after considering BCI results, with a net decrease in recommendations for extended endocrine therapy from 74 to 54 %. After testing, fewer patients wanted to continue extended therapy and decision conflict and anxiety also decreased. Mean STAI and DCS scores were 31.3 versus 29.1 (p = 0.031) and 20.9 versus 10.8 (p < 0.001) pre- and post-test, respectively. Incorporation of BCI into risk/benefit discussions regarding extended endocrine therapy resulted in changes in treatment recommendations and improved patient satisfaction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 37%
Psychology 6 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#862,447
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#94
of 4,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,025
of 281,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#5
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.