↓ Skip to main content

Rapid emotional response and disadvantageous Iowa gambling task performance in women with borderline personality disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Rapid emotional response and disadvantageous Iowa gambling task performance in women with borderline personality disorder
Published in
Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40479-018-0092-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeannette LeGris

Abstract

Adults with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) manifest poor performance on tasks of decision making which may be congruent with their decisional and interpersonal conflicts in real life. Poor decision making is often assumed to be due to impulsive behaviour or weak inhibitory control despite inconsistent evidences of these relationships, leaving questions about the specific nature of these decisional deficits. Decision making in BPD may be compromised by different domains of impulsivity, affective dysregulatory processes or unknown co-morbid ADHD which is considered a developmental precursor to BPD. Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) decision making, 2 tasks of inhibitory control and a self report of ADHD symptoms consisting of 9 subscales were administered to 41 BPD women and 41 healthy controls. No group differences in inhibitory control were present. Net decision making performance and all ADHD subscale ratings differed significantly among BPD women and healthy controls. BPD women did not meet the threshold indicative of moderate to severe ADHD. Three subscales of attention, behaviour/ disorganized and emotive were significantly associated with poor IGT performance in 26 women with BPD. Of these 3 variables, the emotive subscale, representing a rapid emotional response, was the only significant predictor contributing 49% to the variance in poor DM. This is the 1st evidence of an emotive type of impulsivity, representing a type of affective instability that is linked to poor IGT DM in BPD. Findings support the Somatic Marker Hypothesis of IGT DM and may reflect the affective dysregulation that characterizes the disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 26 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 25 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,206,076
of 25,551,063 outputs
Outputs from Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation
#67
of 226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,477
of 335,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,551,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.