↓ Skip to main content

An ecoclimatic framework for evaluating the resilience of vegetation to water deficit

Overview of attention for article published in Global Change Biology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An ecoclimatic framework for evaluating the resilience of vegetation to water deficit
Published in
Global Change Biology, February 2016
DOI 10.1111/gcb.13177
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick J Mitchell, Anthony P O'Grady, Elizabeth A Pinkard, Timothy J Brodribb, Stefan K Arndt, Chris J Blackman, Remko A Duursma, Rod J Fensham, David W Hilbert, Craig R Nitschke, Jaymie Norris, Stephen H Roxburgh, Katinka X Ruthrof, David T Tissue

Abstract

The surge in global efforts to understand the causes and consequences of drought on forest ecosystems has tended to focus on specific impacts such as mortality. We propose an eco-climatic framework that takes a broader view of the ecological relevance of water deficits, linking elements of exposure and resilience to cumulative impacts on a range of ecosystem processes. This eco-climatic framework is underpinned by two hypotheses: 1) exposure to water deficit can be represented probabilistically and used to estimate exposure thresholds across different vegetation types or ecosystems; and 2) the cumulative impact of a series of water deficit events is defined by attributes governing the resistance and recovery of the affected processes. We present case studies comprising Pinus edulis and Eucalyptus globulus, tree species with contrasting ecological strategies, which demonstrate how links between exposure and resilience can be examined within our proposed framework. These examples reveal how climatic thresholds can be defined along a continuum of vegetation functional responses to water deficit regimes. The strength of this framework lies in identifying climatic thresholds on vegetation function in the absence of more complete mechanistic understanding, thereby guiding the formulation, application and benchmarking of more detailed modelling. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
South Africa 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 214 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 21%
Student > Master 35 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Professor 12 5%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 31 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 79 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 6%
Engineering 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 50 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,409,480
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#4,943
of 6,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,890
of 414,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#78
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.