Title |
An ecoclimatic framework for evaluating the resilience of vegetation to water deficit
|
---|---|
Published in |
Global Change Biology, February 2016
|
DOI | 10.1111/gcb.13177 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Patrick J Mitchell, Anthony P O'Grady, Elizabeth A Pinkard, Timothy J Brodribb, Stefan K Arndt, Chris J Blackman, Remko A Duursma, Rod J Fensham, David W Hilbert, Craig R Nitschke, Jaymie Norris, Stephen H Roxburgh, Katinka X Ruthrof, David T Tissue |
Abstract |
The surge in global efforts to understand the causes and consequences of drought on forest ecosystems has tended to focus on specific impacts such as mortality. We propose an eco-climatic framework that takes a broader view of the ecological relevance of water deficits, linking elements of exposure and resilience to cumulative impacts on a range of ecosystem processes. This eco-climatic framework is underpinned by two hypotheses: 1) exposure to water deficit can be represented probabilistically and used to estimate exposure thresholds across different vegetation types or ecosystems; and 2) the cumulative impact of a series of water deficit events is defined by attributes governing the resistance and recovery of the affected processes. We present case studies comprising Pinus edulis and Eucalyptus globulus, tree species with contrasting ecological strategies, which demonstrate how links between exposure and resilience can be examined within our proposed framework. These examples reveal how climatic thresholds can be defined along a continuum of vegetation functional responses to water deficit regimes. The strength of this framework lies in identifying climatic thresholds on vegetation function in the absence of more complete mechanistic understanding, thereby guiding the formulation, application and benchmarking of more detailed modelling. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
South Africa | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 1% |
South Africa | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 214 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 51 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 21% |
Student > Master | 35 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
Professor | 12 | 5% |
Other | 35 | 16% |
Unknown | 31 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 79 | 35% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 27% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 6% |
Engineering | 5 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
Other | 11 | 5% |
Unknown | 50 | 22% |