↓ Skip to main content

From cholera to corals: Viruses as drivers of virulence in a major coral bacterial pathogen

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From cholera to corals: Viruses as drivers of virulence in a major coral bacterial pathogen
Published in
Scientific Reports, December 2015
DOI 10.1038/srep17889
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen D. Weynberg, Christian R. Voolstra, Matthew J. Neave, Patrick Buerger, Madeleine J. H. van Oppen

Abstract

Disease is an increasing threat to reef-building corals. One of the few identified pathogens of coral disease is the bacterium Vibrio coralliilyticus. In Vibrio cholerae, infection by a bacterial virus (bacteriophage) results in the conversion of non-pathogenic strains to pathogenic strains and this can lead to cholera pandemics. Pathogenicity islands encoded in the V. cholerae genome play an important role in pathogenesis. Here we analyse five whole genome sequences of V. coralliilyticus to examine whether virulence is similarly driven by horizontally acquired elements. We demonstrate that bacteriophage genomes encoding toxin genes with homology to those found in pathogenic V. cholerae are integrated in V. coralliilyticus genomes. Virulence factors located on chromosomal pathogenicity islands also exist in some strains of V. coralliilyticus. The presence of these genetic signatures indicates virulence in V. coralliilyticus is driven by prophages and other horizontally acquired elements. Screening for pathogens of coral disease should target conserved regions in these elements.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 142 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 20%
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Bachelor 23 16%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 28 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 18%
Environmental Science 21 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 30 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,964,836
of 24,180,797 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#31,665
of 131,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,005
of 397,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#643
of 2,693 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,180,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,693 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.