↓ Skip to main content

Prevention of diabetes-related foot ulcers and amputations: a cost-utility analysis based on Markov model simulations

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, November 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
4 policy sources
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
Title
Prevention of diabetes-related foot ulcers and amputations: a cost-utility analysis based on Markov model simulations
Published in
Diabetologia, November 2001
DOI 10.1007/s001250100013
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Ragnarson Tennvall, J. Apelqvist

Abstract

We analysed the cost-effectiveness of intensified prevention in diabetic patients with different risks for foot ulcers and lower extremity amputations. Specifically, we examined whether the additional prevention costs associated with present recommendations would be offset by reduced costs of future foot ulcers and amputations. Markov-based 5-year cost-utility simulations of current versus optimal prevention were done for hypothetical cohorts of diabetic patients older than 24 years. The model included eight possible health states for four risk groups. A population of 1677 diabetes patients provided data on present foot ulcer prevention and general mortality. Optimal prevention was defined according to the International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot. Model assumptions, transition probabilities and other data included in the model were based on published literature. The main outcome measures were cumulative incidences of foot ulcers, amputations and deaths, costs, cost-effectiveness, and quality-adjusted life years. An intensified prevention strategy including patient education, foot care and footwear is cost-effective if the risk for foot ulcers and lower extremity amputations can be reduced by 25 %. This is valid for all patients with diabetes except those with no specific risk factors. Providing all diabetic patients at risk or high risk for foot ulcers and amputations with adequate prevention would be a cost-effective or even cost-saving strategy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 137 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 19%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Other 12 8%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 26 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 6%
Engineering 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 30 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,152,277
of 23,680,154 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#640
of 5,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#802
of 44,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,680,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.