↓ Skip to main content

Novel circular DNA viruses associated with Apiaceae and Poaceae from South Africa and New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Novel circular DNA viruses associated with Apiaceae and Poaceae from South Africa and New Zealand
Published in
Archives of Virology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00705-018-4031-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cécile Richet, Simona Kraberger, Denis Filloux, Pauline Bernardo, Gordon W. Harkins, Darren P. Martin, Philippe Roumagnac, Arvind Varsani

Abstract

Advances in molecular techniques used in viral metagenomics coupled with high throughput sequencing is rapidly expanding our knowledge of plant-associated virus diversity. Applying such approaches, we have identified five novel circular replication-associated protein (Rep)-encoding single-stranded (CRESS) DNA viruses from Poaceae and Apiaceae plant from South Africa and New Zealand. These viruses have a simple genomic organization, including two open reading frames that likely encode a Rep and a capsid protein (CP), a conserved nonanucleotide motif on the apex of a putative stem loop structure, and conserved rolling-circle replication and helicase motifs within their likely Rep: all suggesting that they replicate through rolling-circle replication. The Reps and the CPs putatively encoded by these five novel viruses share low to moderate degrees of similarity (22.1 - 44.6%) with other CRESS DNA viruses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 5 25%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,784,236
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#388
of 4,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,370
of 338,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#5
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,261 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.