↓ Skip to main content

The Determining Risk of Vascular Events by Apnea Monitoring (DREAM) study: design, rationale, and methods

Overview of attention for article published in Sleep and Breathing, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
The Determining Risk of Vascular Events by Apnea Monitoring (DREAM) study: design, rationale, and methods
Published in
Sleep and Breathing, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11325-015-1254-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian B. Koo, Christine Won, Bernardo J. Selim, Li Qin, Sangchoon Jeon, Nancy S. Redeker, Dawn M. Bravata, Kingman P. Strohl, John Concato, Andrey V. Zinchuk, Henry K. Yaggi

Abstract

The goal of the Determining Risk of Vascular Events by Apnea Monitoring (DREAM) study is to develop a prognostic model for cardiovascular outcomes, based on physiologic variables-related to breathing, sleep architecture, and oxygenation-measured during polysomnography in US veterans. The DREAM study is a multi-site, retrospective observational cohort study conducted at three Veterans Affairs (VA) centers (West Haven, CT; Indianapolis, IN; Cleveland, OH). Veterans undergoing polysomnography between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2004 were included based on referral for evaluation of sleep-disordered breathing, documented history and physical prior to sleep testing, and ≥2-h sleep monitoring. Demographic, anthropomorphic, medical, medication, and social history factors were recorded. Measures to determine sleep apnea, sleep architecture, and oxygenation were recorded from polysomnography. VA Patient Treatment File, VA-Medicare Data, Vista Computerized Patient Record System, and VA Vital Status File were reviewed on dates subsequent to polysomnography, ranging from 0.06 to 8.8 years (5.5 ± 1.3 years; mean ± SD). The study population includes 1840 predominantly male, middle-aged veterans. As designed, the main primary outcome is the composite endpoint of acute coronary syndrome, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or death. Secondary outcomes include incidents of neoplasm, congestive heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia, diabetes, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Laboratory outcomes include measures of glycemic control, cholesterol, and kidney function. (Actual results are pending.) CONCLUSIONS: This manuscript provides the rationale for the inclusion of veterans in a study to determine the association between physiologic sleep measures and cardiovascular outcomes and specifically the development of a corresponding outcome-based prognostic model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 147 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Master 15 10%
Other 7 5%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 48 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 27%
Psychology 16 11%
Neuroscience 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 57 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2015.
All research outputs
#17,778,101
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Sleep and Breathing
#794
of 1,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,925
of 388,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep and Breathing
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,382 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.