↓ Skip to main content

The Persistence of the Pamphlet: On the Continued Relevance of the Health Information Pamphlet in the Digital Age

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Education, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
The Persistence of the Pamphlet: On the Continued Relevance of the Health Information Pamphlet in the Digital Age
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13187-015-0948-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aman Sium, Meredith Giuliani, Janet Papadakos

Abstract

Since the early 2000s, web and digital health information and education has progressed in both volume and innovation (Dutta-Bergman 2006; Mano, Computers in Human Behavior 39 404 412, 2014). A growing number of leading Canadian health institutions (e.g., hospitals, community health centers, and health ministries) are migrating much of their vital public health information and education, once restricted to pamphlets and other physically distributed materials, to online platforms. Examples of these platforms are websites and web pages, eLearning modules, eBooks, streamed classrooms, audiobooks, and online health videos. The steady migration of health information to online platforms is raising important questions for fields of patient education, such as cancer education. These questions include, but are not limited to (a) are pamphlets still a useful modality for patient information and education when so much is available on the Internet? (b) If so, what should be the relationship between print-based and online health information and education, and when should one modality take precedence over the other? This article responds to these questions within the Canadian health care context.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Other 4 5%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 17%
Psychology 6 8%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 17 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,427,128
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Education
#228
of 1,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,328
of 386,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Education
#7
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.