You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Policy‐Driven Knowledge Agenda for Global Forest and Landscape Restoration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12220 |
| Authors |
Robin L. Chazdon, Pedro H. S. Brancalion, David Lamb, Lars Laestadius, Miguel Calmon, Chetan Kumar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Vietnam | 1 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Philippines | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 93% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 679 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 672 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 117 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 101 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 84 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 69 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 43 | 6% |
| Other | 111 | 16% |
| Unknown | 154 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 228 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 145 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 43 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 7% |
| Unknown | 187 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,573,968
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#491
of 1,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,480
of 405,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.