| Title |
Nitrogenous waste excretion and accumulation of urea and ammonia inChalcalburnus tarichi (Cyprinidae), endemic to the extremely alkaline Lake Van (Eastern Turkey)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, February 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02274218 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eva Danulat, Stephan Kempe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 45% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 9% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,576,061
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Fish Physiology and Biochemistry
#71
of 867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,599
of 61,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fish Physiology and Biochemistry
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 867 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them