Title |
A 3D motion analysis study comparing the effectiveness of cervical spine orthoses at restricting spinal motion through physiological ranges
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Spine Journal, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00586-012-2641-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nicholas Rhys Evans, Georgina Hooper, Rachel Edwards, Gemma Whatling, Valerie Sparkes, Cathy Holt, Sashin Ahuja |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 15% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 15 | 21% |
Unknown | 19 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 12% |
Engineering | 8 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 23 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2018.
All research outputs
#5,832,866
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#672
of 4,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,206
of 282,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#7
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,692 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.