You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Molecular Host Response Assay to Discriminate Between Sepsis and Infection-Negative Systemic Inflammation in Critically Ill Patients: Discovery and Validation in Independent Cohorts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS Medicine, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001916 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leo McHugh, Therese A. Seldon, Roslyn A. Brandon, James T. Kirk, Antony Rapisarda, Allison J. Sutherland, Jeffrey J. Presneill, Deon J. Venter, Jeffrey Lipman, Mervyn R. Thomas, Peter M. C. Klein Klouwenberg, Lonneke van Vught, Brendon Scicluna, Marc Bonten, Olaf L. Cremer, Marcus J. Schultz, Tom van der Poll, Thomas D. Yager, Richard B. Brandon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 192 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 13% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 18% |
| Unknown | 44 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 9% |
| Engineering | 10 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 53 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 288. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#121,926
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#280
of 5,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,780
of 395,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#6
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.