↓ Skip to main content

Randomized Control Trial of COMPASS for Improving Transition Outcomes of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
Title
Randomized Control Trial of COMPASS for Improving Transition Outcomes of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10803-018-3623-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa A. Ruble, John H. McGrew, Michael Toland, Nancy Dalrymple, Medina Adams, Claire Snell-Rood

Abstract

The postsecondary outcomes of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are significantly worse than peers with other disabilities. One problem is the lack of empirically-supported transition planning interventions to guide services and help produce better outcomes. We applied an implementation science approach to adapt and modify an evidence-based consultation intervention originally tested with young children called the Collaborative Model for Promoting Competence and Success (COMPASS; Ruble et al., The collaborative model for promoting competence and success for students with ASD. Springer, New York, 2012a) and evaluate it for efficacy in a randomized controlled trial for transition-age youth. Results replicated findings with younger students with ASD that IEP outcomes were higher for COMPASS compared to the placebo control group (d = 2.1). Consultant fidelity was high and teacher adherence improved over time, replicating the importance of ongoing teacher coaching.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 198 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 14%
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 52 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 18%
Social Sciences 32 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Arts and Humanities 7 4%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 63 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,904,340
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,774
of 5,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,791
of 337,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#52
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.