↓ Skip to main content

Pushing the Limits of Local Excision for Rectal Cancer: Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) for Rectal Cancer Using the Port-in-Port Technique

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Pushing the Limits of Local Excision for Rectal Cancer: Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) for Rectal Cancer Using the Port-in-Port Technique
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, December 2015
DOI 10.1245/s10434-015-4978-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Celia Robinson, Avo Artinyan

Abstract

Radical rectal resection remains the standard of care for the operative treatment of rectal cancer. Local excision via transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) using disposable transanal access ports is an increasingly more common alternative for selected patients. Because of significant variation in perineal anatomy, currently available disposable transanal ports do not allow adequate access for every patient. This report demonstrates TAMIS for one such patient via a novel approach using a single-incision laparoscopic port inserted within a disposable transanal access port. The patient is a 66-year-old man with a history of metastatic anterior uT3N0 rectal cancer 9 cm from the anal verge occupying 40 % of the rectal circumference. The patient refused radical resection and opted for multimodality therapy with local excision. He underwent preoperative chemoradiation with good tumor response. The TAMIS procedure was attempted and aborted due to poor visualization and inadequate access/exposure using the commercially available Gelpoint Path transanal access system. The TAMIS procedure was reattempted and successfully completed via insertion of a laparoscopic single-incision port (GelPoint Mini) within the transanal access port itself (port-in-port technique) to overcome the deficiencies of the transanal access port. This report describes the port-in-port technique together with the stepwise approach to TAMIS. The TAMIS procedure was completed successfully without complications involving grossly negative margins. The patient's postoperative course was uncomplicated, and he was discharged on postoperative day 1. The final pathology showed a complete pathologic response. At this writing, the patient continues to do well 14 months after surgery. Currently available disposable transanal access ports may not allow adequate exposure for all patients undergoing TAMIS. This report describes a port-in-port technique that may allow improved exposure for patients with a difficult perineal anatomy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 19%
Unspecified 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Librarian 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 63%
Unspecified 3 11%
Unknown 7 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,224,641
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,491
of 6,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,228
of 388,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#33
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.