↓ Skip to main content

Prognosis and treatment outcomes of central neurocytomas: clinical interrogation based on a single center experience

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Prognosis and treatment outcomes of central neurocytomas: clinical interrogation based on a single center experience
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11060-018-2997-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joonho Byun, Seok Ho Hong, Min Jae Yoon, Sae Min Kwon, Young Hyun Cho, Jeong Hoon Kim, Chang Jin Kim

Abstract

Central neurocytoma (CN) is a very rare neuronal neoplasm. The clinical implications of the potential prognostic factors for these lesions, including tumor atypia, have therefore not been clarified. Forty CN patients were enrolled and reclassified as typical or atypical in accordance with an MIB-1 labeling index (LI) of above and below 2%. We classified our retrospective study cohort as 21 (52.5%) typical and 19 (47.5%) atypical CN cases. No significant differences were found in terms of sex, mean age, mean tumor size or tumor location between these groups. Recurrences occurred in 2 (9.5%) typical and 6 (33.3%) atypical cases. The typical CN 2-,3- and 5-year PFS rates were 100%, 100%, 92.3%, and those for the atypical group were 93.8%, 78.1%, 65.1%, respectively (p = 0.02). The PFS rates did not statistically differ by treatment modality (gross total resection alone, subtotal resection (STR) alone and STR plus radiation therapy (RT) or radiosurgery (RS)) either in the whole cohort (p = 0.75) or in the typical CN and atypical CN subgroups (p = 0.45 and 0.98, respectively). An atypical histology was the only prognostic indicator of recurrence by univariate analysis (hazard ratio: 5.40, p = 0.04). An atypical lesion (MIB-LI > 2%) is an important prognostic indicator in CN. The clinical implications of the extent of resection for CN patients are still debatable. The use of STR plus RT or RS may be a viable treatment strategy for CN but different therapeutic and follow-up approaches for atypical CN will be needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 56%
Unknown 4 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,299,177
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,146
of 3,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,312
of 352,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#20
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.