↓ Skip to main content

Parenchymal Blood Volume Assessed by C-Arm–Based Computed Tomography in Immediate Posttreatment Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Investigative Radiology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parenchymal Blood Volume Assessed by C-Arm–Based Computed Tomography in Immediate Posttreatment Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published in
Investigative Radiology, February 2016
DOI 10.1097/rli.0000000000000215
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roland Syha, Gerd Grözinger, Ulrich Grosse, Michael Maurer, Lars Zender, Marius Horger, Konstantin Nikolaou, Dominik Ketelsen

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess clinical utility of the quantitative perfusion parameter called parenchymal blood volume (PBV), as derived from C-arm-based computed tomography (CT), for immediate posttreatment assessment of drug-eluting bead (DEB) transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Twenty-four patients with early- or intermediate-stage HCC received DEB-TACE. A total of 52 HCC lesions were treated and assessed by C-arm CT before and after intervention. C-arm CT consisted of nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced acquisitions; from these, PBV maps were reconstructed. Lesion diameter, maximum PBV, and unenhanced parenchyma density were assessed before and after treatment. Diameter of visible contrast media deposits as well as residual vascularization was assessed after delivery of DEB. All patients underwent follow-up using cross-sectional imaging. All assessed lesions were evaluated concerning modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors for HCC. All treated lesions showed significant decrease in PBV after DEB-TACE (mean difference, -15.61 mL/100 mL, P < 0.0001). Eleven lesions showed residual tumoral perfusion in PBV maps associated with an unfavorable outcome compared with completely treated lesions in terms of a lower tumor shrinkage over time (-0.02 ± 0.49 vs -0.76 ± 0.38; P < 0.0001). A contrast media deposit was seen in 78% of treated HCC lesions with a tendency toward better visibility in encapsulated lesions. Nonenhanced parenchyma density was significantly higher in all treated segments (149.69 ± 58.6 vs 68.42 ± 18.04, P < 0.0001). Parenchymal blood volume values as derived from C-arm CT acquisitions in combination with nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced C-arm CT images are useful in posttreatment assessment of DEB-TACE in HCC. Residual tumor perfusion in PBV maps have predictive potential for mid-term tumor response in HCC and could allow a more individualized treatment schedule for DEB-TACE in HCC patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 21%
Student > Master 3 21%
Researcher 2 14%
Professor 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 57%
Computer Science 1 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2016.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Investigative Radiology
#1,251
of 2,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,610
of 406,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Investigative Radiology
#14
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.