↓ Skip to main content

Bad bank(s) and the recapitalisation of the banking sector

Overview of attention for article published in Intereconomics, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Bad bank(s) and the recapitalisation of the banking sector
Published in
Intereconomics, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10272-009-0298-7
Authors

Dorothea Schäfer, Klaus F. Zimmermann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Student > Master 5 15%
Other 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 29%
Social Sciences 7 21%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 18%
Philosophy 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,062,453
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Intereconomics
#74
of 287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,868
of 112,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intereconomics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 287 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them